Notes
Outline
Municipal Wireless Network
Wireless Potential
The Office of Central Inspection, the Water & Sewer Dept. and Environmental Services have been testing the use of wireless technology in the field with good results
By accessing City information from the field staff is able to get into the field earlier in the morning and stay out there until later in the day
The City benefits from a mobile computing capability – the operational efficiencies provide a significant increase in productivity
Wireless Potential
26 Building Inspectors are able to spend 1 extra hour performing inspections each day
16 Neighborhood Inspectors are able to spend 2 extra hours per day in the field
This equates to 58 extra man hours a day to perform inspections
More inspections can be completed each day with less overtime required
Wireless Potential
Mobile Workforce
Remote access to work orders, inspections, plans, permits, etc.
Public Safety
Mobile Incident Response and Command Centers
Mobile reporting, records lookup
Records Management Systems (RMS) Interface
Surveillance
Remote Surveillance of LOIs (high crime areas, parks, banks, schools, airports, public utility buildings, etc.)
Current Status
Review of previous proposal
Consideration of total cost of project
Consideration of technology risk
Since beginning this project, technology has changed and so has the cost
Trend is for local to government to facilitate deployment, but have a private sector provider own and operate the network
Current Status
For municipal wireless to be successful the business model is as important as the technology
There are multiple technologies that can provide wireless broadband throughout the city
Cellular
WiFi Mesh
WiMax
Future technology?
The market is in flux, different companies are partnering all the time
 Municipal Wireless Technologies
Cellular (Aircards)
Advantages
Exists now
Service has improved to broadband speeds when mobile
Costs continue to decrease
Easy to deploy
Uses licensed spectrum
Disadvantages
Slowest of the available technologies
Least capacity for video
Municipal Wireless Technologies
WiFi Mesh
Advantages
Connectivity to network is built into most computers
Higher capacity than cellular
No towers needed – but lots of light poles
More capacity for full-motion video
Disadvantages
Uses unlicensed spectrum, interference can be an issue
In a metropolitan environment, only one carrier can exist
Expensive to use for sparsely populated areas, due to the large number of access points required
Municipal Wireless Technologies
WiMax
Advantages
Has a reach of several miles, so fewer access points are required
Easily scalable for capacity and geographic area
User costs are low
More capacity for video
Disadvantages
Requires towers for access points
Other Communities
Philadelphia
Objectives
Address the digital divide issue
Economic development
Increased government efficiency (mobile workforce)
Business models
Build it, own it, operate it
Public-private partnership
Private enterprise to fund it, build it, manage it
Earthlink
Other Communities
Corpus Christi
Objectives
Improved customer service and reduced costs through automated gas and water meter reading
All meters are read twice daily and the results are provided to customers via the Internet
Also available for other city staff, residents and visitors
Business Models
Build it, own it, operate it
Now owned and operated by Earthlink
Other Communities
Clearwire Corporation and Sprint Nextel
Objectives
Provide broadband access to citizens using WiMax technology – currently Clearwire services 29 municipalities
Sprint Nextel has announced they will spend $3 billion to provide WiMax service that will reach 100 million people by the end of 2008
Sell residential and business broadband service
Notes
Requires cell towers or similar structures to deploy
These two enterprises own most of the spectrum for this technology
Working Together
City staff continues to work with staff from USD 259, Sedgwick County and Westar Energy
Increased buying power
Service delivery area enhanced
Potentially different needs
Moving Forward
RFP to let vendors know that the City of Wichita would like for them to build a municipal wireless network
Decision points that other cities have addressed with an RFP:
Buy, build or lease
Aligning technology with the needs of citizens, business and a mobile workforce
Moving Forward
Items that staff envisions including in an RFP:
Business model
Technology utilized
Deployment methodology
Planned use of a wireless network
Moving Forward
As policy leaders, what do you envision being included in an RFP?
Policy issues
Building of towers
Public-private partnership
Digital divide
Aligning with other community needs
Moving Forward
Questions / Discussion