|
|
|
Proposed Ordinance Revisions |
|
Proposed Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
StopBlight concept grew out of goal to eliminate
blighted property and restore it to usefulness. |
|
The proposed process included: |
|
Conducting a systematic inventory of blighted
property |
|
Strengthening tools to force owner compliance |
|
Identifying ways to acquire non-compliant
property |
|
Correct blighting conditions and replace them
with safe, affordable housing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five strategies were identified: |
|
Work with Sedgwick County to: pursue more timely
tax-foreclosure sales; take advantage of Kansas statute allowing “special”
tax foreclosure sales; and actively bid on tax-delinquent/foreclosed
property |
|
Identify resources to purchase/bid on and rehab
properties |
|
Strengthen Boarded/Abandoned Building policies |
|
Require local property agent registration |
|
Create means to acquire and “bank” land for
reuse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Neglected Buildings Code (Chapter 30) |
|
Housing Code Ordinance (Chapter 20) Amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neglected unoccupied buildings requiring
registration |
|
Neglected, unoccupied building that has had one
or more of the following: |
|
Within last 18 months, received 2 or more
notices of violation and owner failed to take actions to abate |
|
Boarded for more than 90 days |
|
Unsecured windows, doors or other openings |
|
Significant fire, wind or water damage, and is
uninhabitable |
|
Criminal nuisance determination (as defined by
State law) |
|
Substantial deterioration due to lack of
maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neglected, occupied buildings requiring
registration |
|
Occupied building which has had one or more of
the following in preceding 18 months: |
|
Two or more notices of violation of Chapter 18,
20 or 30 and owner failed to take actions to abate |
|
Declaration as a criminal nuisance (as defined
by State law) |
|
Owner failure to appear in court per process
service |
|
Owner refusal of certified notices |
|
Substantial deterioration due to lack of
maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of neglected buildings shall be required
upon notification from the Superintendent of Central Inspection, to
register such building with OCI |
|
Registration fee of $25 is required |
|
Registration statement (Statement of Intent)
must be submitted and approved by the Superintendent of OCI |
|
New registration is required for each new owner |
|
Appeals of the Superintendent’s decision
regarding registration requirements, can be made to the Board of Code
Standards and Appeals, and subsequently to City Council |
|
|
|
|
|
The Statement of Intent must include: |
|
Description of the premises |
|
Names and addresses of the owner(s) |
|
Names and addresses of all known lienholders
& others with ownership interests in the building |
|
Name of resident agent designated to receive
notices and/or act on the behalf of an absentee owner (an owner who lives
outside Sedgwick County) |
|
If vacant, the projected period of vacancy and
plan and timetable to comply with codes |
|
|
|
|
|
Neglected building removed from registration: |
|
If legally occupied for 30 days |
|
If in compliance with applicable codes |
|
If removed or demolished by owner |
|
If abated or demolished by the City of Wichita |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of neglected buildings, as defined in
Chapter 30.01.020 (slides 5 & 6), who fail to register after proper
notice, or fail to comply with the approved Statement of Intent, may be
liable for a civil penalty of $250 per building for each 90-day period of
non-compliance, not to exceed $1,000 per calendar year, unless: |
|
Statement of Intent is filed and approved, and |
|
Owner is proceeding in good faith to complete
the repair or rehab, or |
|
Structure is subject of active building permit
for repair or rehab, or |
|
Structure is maintained in compliance with this
chapter and is being actively offered for sale, lease, rent, etc., or |
|
Owner can demonstrate good faith effort to
comply with Statement of Intent |
|
|
|
|
If the 90 day provisions result in a penalty,
the $250 penalty can be assessed for each 90 day period thereafter (up to
$1,000 per calendar year) |
|
All penalties are payable to the City Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
Superintendent of OCI can use any legal means to
recover penalties |
|
Use of collection agencies |
|
Notice to owners and reporting of delinquencies
to credit bureaus |
|
Initiation of civil actions in District Court to
recover fees and/or to foreclose liens |
|
|
|
|
Several new or significantly amended
definitions, including: “Apartment building”, “Operator”, “Owner” and
“Resident Agent” - provide necessary clarifications for enforcement and
prosecution purposes |
|
Key linkages to new Neglected Buildings Code’s
building and/or out-of-county “resident agent” registration requirements. |
|
Increased penalties for first and subsequent
convictions for the same property owner |
|
|
|
|
First conviction: up to $1,000 |
|
Second: minimum $100 up to $1,000 |
|
Third:
minimum $500 up to $1,000 |
|
Fourth or subsequent: minimum $1,000 up to $2,500 |
|
Imprisonment up to 12 months in addition to
fines (unchanged from current Code) |
|
OR Community Service if court determines
defendant is unable to pay the fines |
|
Note:
The current fine is up to $500 per violation with no
established minimum fines for repeat offenders. |
|
|
|
|
Convictions for violations of the Housing Code
within 3 years of the date of the violation, will be included when
determining “repeat” offenders |
|
Each day that violation continues shall
constitute a separate offense and be punishable (current language) |
|
In addition to fines, required community
service, and/or imprisonment, the court may require that the owner register
their property as required by the Neglected Building Code (new Title 30) |
|
|
|
|
|
Though not specifically outlined in the Housing
Code amendments, additional initiatives have been identified by staff, to
complement the StopBlight program, one of which includes a Housing Code
Diversion Program for First Time Offenders |
|
Purpose:
to provide the property owner time to abate all housing conditions
to avoid conviction |
|
Available for first time offenders |
|
Will defer prosecution for 9 months (but
generally for not longer than 6 months) |
|
If defendant complies with conditions and
repairs property, charge will be dismissed at end of diversion period |
|
Failure to comply will result in case being
scheduled for trial |
|
|
|
|
Applicant will pay a non-refundable fee to apply |
|
Applicant will waive right to speedy trial |
|
Prosecutor will determine eligibility |
|
If eligible, a pre-diversion conference will be
held with housing inspector, diversion coordinator, home repair program
staff and the applicant |
|
|
|
|
|
The City Prosecutor will consider the following
factors to determine eligibility for the Diversion Program: |
|
Nature of the violation(s) and circumstances |
|
Special characteristics and circumstances of the
defendant |
|
Whether the defendant is a first-time offender |
|
Whether the diversion program is appropriate to
the needs of the defendant |
|
The impact of diversion on the community |
|
Recommendations of housing code inspectors |
|
Mitigating or aggravating circumstances
surrounding the code violation/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
Staff continuing to work on Strategy 1 regarding
the tax foreclosure process |
|
May require following up on changes in State law
which were included in the City’s 06 legislative agenda |
|
Strategy 2 (identify resources) is being
addressed through existing programs |
|
Would like to consider directing a portion of
the penalties and registration fees to StopBlight support costs in the
Housing & Community Services (home repair), OCI and Law Departments |
|
Strategy 5 (land banking) may be addressed
through a currently proposed Redevelopment Authority or similar entity |
|
|
|
|
|
Three additional initiatives have been
identified by staff, to complement the StopBlight program |
|
Housing Code Diversion Program for First Time
Offenders (described in previous slides) |
|
Project REHAB, to repair abandoned housing using
currently available State law |
|
StopBlight Action Response Team (START) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
To REhab Houses Abandoned By Owners |
|
Abandoned property – State definition: |
|
Any residential real estate for which taxes are
delinquent for the preceding two years and which has been unoccupied
continuously by persons legally in possession for the preceding 180 days |
|
|
|
|
|
City or the proposed Redevelopment Authority,
will partner with nonprofits to help the nonprofits apply one of the
following tools to acquire abandoned property: |
|
Offer to purchase from the owner |
|
Purchase at tax foreclosure sale |
|
File petition in District Court for temporary
possession (Nonprofits can do so under current State law) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City will provide rehab funds from existing home
repair programs (CDBG and HOME) or newly funded programs |
|
Nonprofit will submit required court documents
and reports, perform repairs, and upon completion, sell the property to an
owner-occupant |
|
If the owner appears to reclaim property during
or immediately after repairs are made, they will be required to repay all
repair costs made to date |
|
Propose to implement on a test case house |
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
to provide a comprehensive, pro-active inter-departmental approach
to eliminating blight and other neighborhood nuisances |
|
|
|
|
|
Membership from the following departments: |
|
Office of Central Inspection |
|
Environmental Services |
|
Police |
|
Law |
|
Neighborhood Services |
|
Municipal Court Administrator |
|
Housing and Community Services |
|
|
|
|
|
Activities |
|
Door-to-door or block-to block surveys to
identify problems & make StopBlight referrals |
|
Meetings and partnering with neighborhood
residents and/or neighborhood associations |
|
Meetings with landlords or non-resident property
owners |
|
Provide legal counsel to the team |
|
Staff recommends Beat 44 as a Pilot Area for
START to begin |
|
|
|
|
|
A variety of strategies have been planned: |
|
Housing Code Amendments |
|
Neglected Building Code Creation |
|
Diversion Program |
|
Project REHAB and Test Case |
|
START |
|
Projected Implementation – November/ |
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
|
City Council workshops/meeting agenda item in
January, July and September 2006 |
|
District Advisory Board presentations and review
10/2006) |
|
Housing Advisory Board (2006) |
|
WIN (9/14/06) |
|
Various neighborhood associations (July –
Oct/06) |
|
Sunflower Community Action (10/5/06) |
|
Citizens Academy (10/17/06) |
|
District I Leadership Meeting (10/21/06) |
|
Connect with Community Meeting (10/26/06) |
|
|
|
|
|
City Council Public Hearing/1st Reading of
proposed ordinances (Titles 20 & 30) |
|
November 14, 2006 |
|
Second Reading |
|
November 21, 2006 |
|
Publication and effective date |
|
November 24, 2006 |
|