Notes
Outline
StopBlight – Ready to GO!
Proposed Ordinance Revisions
Proposed Programs
        Background
StopBlight concept grew out of goal to eliminate blighted property and restore it to usefulness.
The proposed process included:
Conducting a systematic inventory of blighted property
Strengthening tools to force owner compliance
Identifying ways to acquire non-compliant property
Correct blighting conditions and replace them with safe, affordable housing
   Strategy Update
Five strategies were identified:
Work with Sedgwick County to: pursue more timely tax-foreclosure sales; take advantage of Kansas statute allowing “special” tax foreclosure sales; and actively bid on tax-delinquent/foreclosed property
Identify resources to purchase/bid on and rehab properties
Strengthen Boarded/Abandoned Building policies
Require local property agent registration
Create means to acquire and “bank” land for reuse
    Today’s Focus: 
    Strategies 3, 4
New Neglected Buildings Code (Chapter 30)
Housing Code Ordinance (Chapter 20) Amendments
Neglected Building Code -Chapter 30.01.020 – Definitions
Neglected unoccupied buildings requiring registration
Neglected, unoccupied building that has had one or more of the following:
Within last 18 months, received 2 or more notices of violation and owner failed to take actions to abate
Boarded for more than 90 days
Unsecured windows, doors or other openings
Significant fire, wind or water damage, and is uninhabitable
Criminal nuisance determination (as defined by State law)
Substantial deterioration due to lack of maintenance
Neglected Building Code (Ch. 30.01) - Definitions
Neglected, occupied buildings requiring registration
Occupied building which has had one or more of the following in preceding 18 months:
Two or more notices of violation of Chapter 18, 20 or 30 and owner failed to take actions to abate
Declaration as a criminal nuisance (as defined by State law)
Owner failure to appear in court per process service
Owner refusal of certified notices
Substantial deterioration due to lack of maintenance
Chapter 30.01 – Registration
Owners of neglected buildings shall be required upon notification from the Superintendent of Central Inspection, to register such building with OCI
Registration fee of $25 is required
Registration statement (Statement of Intent) must be submitted and approved by the Superintendent of OCI
New registration is required for each new owner
Appeals of the Superintendent’s decision regarding registration requirements, can be made to the Board of Code Standards and Appeals, and subsequently to City Council
Chapter 30.01 –
Registration Details
The Statement of Intent must include:
Description of the premises
Names and addresses of the owner(s)
Names and addresses of all known lienholders & others with ownership interests in the building
Name of resident agent designated to receive notices and/or act on the behalf of an absentee owner (an owner who lives outside Sedgwick County)
If vacant, the projected period of vacancy and plan and timetable to comply with codes
Chapter 30.01 –
Registration Removal
Neglected building removed from registration:
If legally occupied for 30 days
If in compliance with applicable codes
If removed or demolished by owner
If abated or demolished by the City of Wichita
Chapter 30.01 – Penalties
Owners of neglected buildings, as defined in Chapter 30.01.020 (slides 5 & 6), who fail to register after proper notice, or fail to comply with the approved Statement of Intent, may be liable for a civil penalty of $250 per building for each 90-day period of non-compliance, not to exceed $1,000 per calendar year, unless:
Statement of Intent is filed and approved, and
Owner is proceeding in good faith to complete the repair or rehab, or
Structure is subject of active building permit for repair or rehab, or
Structure is maintained in compliance with this chapter and is being actively offered for sale, lease, rent, etc., or
Owner can demonstrate good faith effort to comply with Statement of Intent
Chapter 30.01 –
Registration Penalties
If the 90 day provisions result in a penalty, the $250 penalty can be assessed for each 90 day period thereafter (up to $1,000 per calendar year)
All penalties are payable to the City Treasurer
Failure to Pay Penalties -
City Options
Superintendent of OCI can use any legal means to recover penalties
Use of collection agencies
Notice to owners and reporting of delinquencies to credit bureaus
Initiation of civil actions in District Court to recover fees and/or to foreclose liens
Housing Code - Changes
Several new or significantly amended definitions, including: “Apartment building”, “Operator”, “Owner” and “Resident Agent” - provide necessary clarifications for enforcement and prosecution purposes
Key linkages to new Neglected Buildings Code’s building and/or out-of-county “resident agent” registration requirements.
Increased penalties for first and subsequent convictions for the same property owner
Housing Code - Penalties
First conviction: up to $1,000
Second: minimum $100 up to $1,000
Third:  minimum $500 up to $1,000
Fourth or subsequent:  minimum $1,000 up to $2,500
Imprisonment up to 12 months in addition to fines (unchanged from current Code)
OR Community Service if court determines defendant is unable to pay the fines
Note:  The current fine is up to $500 per violation with no established minimum fines for repeat offenders.
Housing Code - Penalties
Convictions for violations of the Housing Code within 3 years of the date of the violation, will be included when determining “repeat” offenders
Each day that violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and be punishable (current language)
In addition to fines, required community service, and/or imprisonment, the court may require that the owner register their property as required by the Neglected Building Code (new Title 30)
Housing Code Diversion
Though not specifically outlined in the Housing Code amendments, additional initiatives have been identified by staff, to complement the StopBlight program, one of which includes a Housing Code Diversion Program for First Time Offenders
Purpose:  to provide the property owner time to abate all housing conditions to avoid conviction
Available for first time offenders
Will defer prosecution for 9 months (but generally for not longer than 6 months)
If defendant complies with conditions and repairs property, charge will be dismissed at end of diversion period
Failure to comply will result in case being scheduled for trial
Diversion Program
Process
Applicant will pay a non-refundable fee to apply
Applicant will waive right to speedy trial
Prosecutor will determine eligibility
If eligible, a pre-diversion conference will be held with housing inspector, diversion coordinator, home repair program staff and the applicant
Diversion Eligibility
Criteria
The City Prosecutor will consider the following factors to determine eligibility for the Diversion Program:
Nature of the violation(s) and circumstances
Special characteristics and circumstances of the defendant
Whether the defendant is a first-time offender
Whether the diversion program is appropriate to the needs of the defendant
The impact of diversion on the community
Recommendations of housing code inspectors
Mitigating or aggravating circumstances surrounding the code violation/s.
StopBlight - Conclusion
Staff continuing to work on Strategy 1 regarding the tax foreclosure process
May require following up on changes in State law which were included in the City’s 06 legislative agenda
Strategy 2 (identify resources) is being addressed through existing programs
Would like to consider directing a portion of the penalties and registration fees to StopBlight support costs in the Housing & Community Services (home repair), OCI and Law Departments
Strategy 5 (land banking) may be addressed through a currently proposed Redevelopment Authority or similar entity
Additional Initiatives to Complement StopBlight
Three additional initiatives have been identified by staff, to complement the StopBlight program
Housing Code Diversion Program for First Time Offenders (described in previous slides)
Project REHAB, to repair abandoned housing using currently available State law
StopBlight Action Response Team (START)
   Project REHAB
Purpose:  To REhab Houses Abandoned By Owners
Abandoned property – State definition:
Any residential real estate for which taxes are delinquent for the preceding two years and which has been unoccupied continuously by persons legally in possession for the preceding 180 days
      Project REHAB
City or the proposed Redevelopment Authority, will partner with nonprofits to help the nonprofits apply one of the following tools to acquire abandoned property:
Offer to purchase from the owner
Purchase at tax foreclosure sale
File petition in District Court for temporary possession (Nonprofits can do so under current State law)
   Project REHAB
City will provide rehab funds from existing home repair programs (CDBG and HOME) or newly funded programs
Nonprofit will submit required court documents and reports, perform repairs, and upon completion, sell the property to an owner-occupant
If the owner appears to reclaim property during or immediately after repairs are made, they will be required to repay all repair costs made to date
Propose to implement on a test case house
StopBlight Action
Response Team
(START)
Purpose:  to provide a comprehensive, pro-active inter-departmental approach to eliminating blight and other neighborhood nuisances
StopBlight Action
Response Team
(START)
Membership from the following departments:
Office of Central Inspection
Environmental Services
Police
Law
Neighborhood Services
Municipal Court Administrator
Housing and Community Services
StopBlight Action
Response Team (START)
Activities
Door-to-door or block-to block surveys to identify problems & make StopBlight referrals
Meetings and partnering with neighborhood residents and/or neighborhood associations
Meetings with landlords or non-resident property owners
Provide legal counsel to the team
Staff recommends Beat 44 as a Pilot Area for START to begin
      Conclusion
A variety of strategies have been planned:
Housing Code Amendments
Neglected Building Code Creation
Diversion Program
Project REHAB and Test Case
START
Projected Implementation – November/
December 2006
Community Presentations
City Council workshops/meeting agenda item in January, July and September 2006
District Advisory Board presentations and review 10/2006)
Housing Advisory Board (2006)
WIN (9/14/06)
Various neighborhood associations (July – Oct/06)
Sunflower Community Action (10/5/06)
Citizens Academy (10/17/06)
District I Leadership Meeting (10/21/06)
Connect with Community Meeting (10/26/06)
Proposed City Council Review of Adopting Ordinances
City Council Public Hearing/1st Reading of proposed ordinances (Titles 20 & 30)
November 14, 2006
Second Reading
November 21, 2006
Publication and effective date
November 24, 2006